Latest FORD L800 Recallshttp://www.arfc.org/rss/feeds/autos/ford/l800The latest automotive recalls from the National Highway Transportation Safety AdministrationSat, 20 Oct 2018 12:42:18 GMTen-us1440Copyright 2018, Eladrel Technologies, LLCAutomotive1994 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, STORAGE, TANK ASSEMBLYTHE LABELS REMINDING OPERATORS CLOSING THE FUEL TANK CROSSOVER VALVES TO REOPEN THE VALVES BEFORE OPERATING THE ENGINES WERE OMITTED. IF THE TANKS ARE OVER HALF FULL AND VEHICLE OPERATION WAS RESUMED WITHOUT REOPENING THE FUEL TANK CROSS-OVER VALVES, PRESSURE COULD BUILD IN ONE OF THE TANKS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000007131000015969000000146/recall.aspxMon, 15 Aug 1994 00:00:00 GMT1993 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, STORAGE, TANK ASSEMBLYTHE LABELS REMINDING OPERATORS CLOSING THE FUEL TANK CROSSOVER VALVES TO REOPEN THE VALVES BEFORE OPERATING THE ENGINES WERE OMITTED. IF THE TANKS ARE OVER HALF FULL AND VEHICLE OPERATION WAS RESUMED WITHOUT REOPENING THE FUEL TANK CROSS-OVER VALVES, PRESSURE COULD BUILD IN ONE OF THE TANKS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000007131000015963000000146/recall.aspxMon, 15 Aug 1994 00:00:00 GMT1992 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, STORAGE, TANK ASSEMBLYTHE LABELS REMINDING OPERATORS CLOSING THE FUEL TANK CROSSOVER VALVES TO REOPEN THE VALVES BEFORE OPERATING THE ENGINES WERE OMITTED. IF THE TANKS ARE OVER HALF FULL AND VEHICLE OPERATION WAS RESUMED WITHOUT REOPENING THE FUEL TANK CROSS-OVER VALVES, PRESSURE COULD BUILD IN ONE OF THE TANKS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000007131000015968000000146/recall.aspxMon, 15 Aug 1994 00:00:00 GMT1991 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, STORAGE, TANK ASSEMBLYTHE LABELS REMINDING OPERATORS CLOSING THE FUEL TANK CROSSOVER VALVES TO REOPEN THE VALVES BEFORE OPERATING THE ENGINES WERE OMITTED. IF THE TANKS ARE OVER HALF FULL AND VEHICLE OPERATION WAS RESUMED WITHOUT REOPENING THE FUEL TANK CROSS-OVER VALVES, PRESSURE COULD BUILD IN ONE OF THE TANKS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000007131000015967000000146/recall.aspxMon, 15 Aug 1994 00:00:00 GMT1977 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, COOLING SYSTEM, FANTHE ENGINE COOLING FAN BLADES MAY CRACK AND CHIP DUE TO HIGH STRESSES CAUSED BY VIBRATIONS. THE CHIPPED PIECES OF THE BLADE COULD FLY INTO THE UNDERHOOD COMPONENTS. ALSO, THESE PIECES COULD FLY OUT FROM THE VEHICLE IF THE HOOD IS OPEN AND THE ENGINE IS RUNNING.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002898000027470000000136/recall.aspxMon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 GMT1976 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, COOLING SYSTEM, FANTHE ENGINE COOLING FAN BLADES MAY CRACK AND CHIP DUE TO HIGH STRESSES CAUSED BY VIBRATIONS. THE CHIPPED PIECES OF THE BLADE COULD FLY INTO THE UNDERHOOD COMPONENTS. ALSO, THESE PIECES COULD FLY OUT FROM THE VEHICLE IF THE HOOD IS OPEN AND THE ENGINE IS RUNNING.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002898000027469000000136/recall.aspxMon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 GMT1975 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, COOLING SYSTEM, FANTHE ENGINE COOLING FAN BLADES MAY CRACK AND CHIP DUE TO HIGH STRESSES CAUSED BY VIBRATIONS. THE CHIPPED PIECES OF THE BLADE COULD FLY INTO THE UNDERHOOD COMPONENTS. ALSO, THESE PIECES COULD FLY OUT FROM THE VEHICLE IF THE HOOD IS OPEN AND THE ENGINE IS RUNNING.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002898000027468000000136/recall.aspxMon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 GMT1974 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, COOLING SYSTEM, FANTHE ENGINE COOLING FAN BLADES MAY CRACK AND CHIP DUE TO HIGH STRESSES CAUSED BY VIBRATIONS. THE CHIPPED PIECES OF THE BLADE COULD FLY INTO THE UNDERHOOD COMPONENTS. ALSO, THESE PIECES COULD FLY OUT FROM THE VEHICLE IF THE HOOD IS OPEN AND THE ENGINE IS RUNNING.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002898000027467000000136/recall.aspxMon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 GMT1973 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, COOLING SYSTEM, FANTHE ENGINE COOLING FAN BLADES MAY CRACK AND CHIP DUE TO HIGH STRESSES CAUSED BY VIBRATIONS. THE CHIPPED PIECES OF THE BLADE COULD FLY INTO THE UNDERHOOD COMPONENTS. ALSO, THESE PIECES COULD FLY OUT FROM THE VEHICLE IF THE HOOD IS OPEN AND THE ENGINE IS RUNNING.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002898000027466000000136/recall.aspxMon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 GMT1972 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, COOLING SYSTEM, FANTHE ENGINE COOLING FAN BLADES MAY CRACK AND CHIP DUE TO HIGH STRESSES CAUSED BY VIBRATIONS. THE CHIPPED PIECES OF THE BLADE COULD FLY INTO THE UNDERHOOD COMPONENTS. ALSO, THESE PIECES COULD FLY OUT FROM THE VEHICLE IF THE HOOD IS OPEN AND THE ENGINE IS RUNNING.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002898000027465000000136/recall.aspxMon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 GMT1971 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, COOLING SYSTEM, FANTHE ENGINE COOLING FAN BLADES MAY CRACK AND CHIP DUE TO HIGH STRESSES CAUSED BY VIBRATIONS. THE CHIPPED PIECES OF THE BLADE COULD FLY INTO THE UNDERHOOD COMPONENTS. ALSO, THESE PIECES COULD FLY OUT FROM THE VEHICLE IF THE HOOD IS OPEN AND THE ENGINE IS RUNNING.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002898000027464000000136/recall.aspxMon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 GMT1970 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING, COOLING SYSTEM, FANTHE ENGINE COOLING FAN BLADES MAY CRACK AND CHIP DUE TO HIGH STRESSES CAUSED BY VIBRATIONS. THE CHIPPED PIECES OF THE BLADE COULD FLY INTO THE UNDERHOOD COMPONENTS. ALSO, THESE PIECES COULD FLY OUT FROM THE VEHICLE IF THE HOOD IS OPEN AND THE ENGINE IS RUNNING.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002898000027463000000136/recall.aspxMon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 GMT1978 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONT, ANCHORAGETHE SEAT BELTS ON THE INVOLVED VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NOS. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION", AND 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES". THE NON-CONFORMITY EXISTS BECAUSE WHEN THE DRIVER"S SEAT IS ADJUSTED TO THE FULL FORWARD POSITION, THE SEAT CUSHION IS ADJUSTED TO MAXIMUM ELEVATION, AND THE SEAT BACK IS TILTED TO THE FULLY UPRIGHT POSITION, THE SEAT BELTS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE SOME DRIVERS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002628000051896000000265/recall.aspxTue, 25 Oct 1977 00:00:00 GMT1977 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONT, ANCHORAGETHE SEAT BELTS ON THE INVOLVED VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NOS. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION", AND 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES". THE NON-CONFORMITY EXISTS BECAUSE WHEN THE DRIVER"S SEAT IS ADJUSTED TO THE FULL FORWARD POSITION, THE SEAT CUSHION IS ADJUSTED TO MAXIMUM ELEVATION, AND THE SEAT BACK IS TILTED TO THE FULLY UPRIGHT POSITION, THE SEAT BELTS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE SOME DRIVERS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002628000027470000000265/recall.aspxTue, 25 Oct 1977 00:00:00 GMT1976 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONT, ANCHORAGETHE SEAT BELTS ON THE INVOLVED VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NOS. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION", AND 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES". THE NON-CONFORMITY EXISTS BECAUSE WHEN THE DRIVER"S SEAT IS ADJUSTED TO THE FULL FORWARD POSITION, THE SEAT CUSHION IS ADJUSTED TO MAXIMUM ELEVATION, AND THE SEAT BACK IS TILTED TO THE FULLY UPRIGHT POSITION, THE SEAT BELTS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE SOME DRIVERS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002628000027469000000265/recall.aspxTue, 25 Oct 1977 00:00:00 GMT1975 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONT, ANCHORAGETHE SEAT BELTS ON THE INVOLVED VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NOS. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION", AND 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES". THE NON-CONFORMITY EXISTS BECAUSE WHEN THE DRIVER"S SEAT IS ADJUSTED TO THE FULL FORWARD POSITION, THE SEAT CUSHION IS ADJUSTED TO MAXIMUM ELEVATION, AND THE SEAT BACK IS TILTED TO THE FULLY UPRIGHT POSITION, THE SEAT BELTS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE SOME DRIVERS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002628000027468000000265/recall.aspxTue, 25 Oct 1977 00:00:00 GMT1974 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONT, ANCHORAGETHE SEAT BELTS ON THE INVOLVED VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NOS. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION", AND 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES". THE NON-CONFORMITY EXISTS BECAUSE WHEN THE DRIVER"S SEAT IS ADJUSTED TO THE FULL FORWARD POSITION, THE SEAT CUSHION IS ADJUSTED TO MAXIMUM ELEVATION, AND THE SEAT BACK IS TILTED TO THE FULLY UPRIGHT POSITION, THE SEAT BELTS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE SOME DRIVERS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002628000027467000000265/recall.aspxTue, 25 Oct 1977 00:00:00 GMT1973 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONT, ANCHORAGETHE SEAT BELTS ON THE INVOLVED VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NOS. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION", AND 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES". THE NON-CONFORMITY EXISTS BECAUSE WHEN THE DRIVER"S SEAT IS ADJUSTED TO THE FULL FORWARD POSITION, THE SEAT CUSHION IS ADJUSTED TO MAXIMUM ELEVATION, AND THE SEAT BACK IS TILTED TO THE FULLY UPRIGHT POSITION, THE SEAT BELTS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE SOME DRIVERS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002628000027466000000265/recall.aspxTue, 25 Oct 1977 00:00:00 GMT1972 FORD L800 RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONT, ANCHORAGETHE SEAT BELTS ON THE INVOLVED VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NOS. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION", AND 209, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES". THE NON-CONFORMITY EXISTS BECAUSE WHEN THE DRIVER"S SEAT IS ADJUSTED TO THE FULL FORWARD POSITION, THE SEAT CUSHION IS ADJUSTED TO MAXIMUM ELEVATION, AND THE SEAT BACK IS TILTED TO THE FULLY UPRIGHT POSITION, THE SEAT BELTS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE SOME DRIVERS.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/ford/l800/recalls/000002628000027465000000265/recall.aspxTue, 25 Oct 1977 00:00:00 GMT